Call for Workshop Contribution “Pinpointing pivotal moments in collaboration”

7 minute read

I am one of the organizers for this workshop.  Please forward to colleagues who might be interested.

STELLAR 2009 Alpine Rendez-Vous

November 30-December 1 2009, in Garmisch-Partenkirchen (Germany)

Organisers


Kristine Lund (CNRS, University of Lyon)

contact: Kristine.Lund@univ-lyon2.fr

Nancy Law (Hong Kong University)

Carolyn rose (Carnegie Mellon University)

Dan Suthers (University of Hawai’i)

Chris Teplovs (University of Toronto)

Abstract


In a previous workshop at the International Conference for the Learning Sciences

2008, entitled “A Common Framework for CSCL Interaction Analysis”, we

explored the diversity and commonality of the field on four dimensions: the purpose

of analysis, the units of interaction that are taken as basic in the

analysis, representations of data and analytic interpretations, and analytic

manipulations taken on those representations. We sought to establish requirements

for a common conceptual and representational framework to support collaborative

learning process analysis. To this end, our intention was to focus on three main

activities: namely, demonstrating our analytic tools to one another in the context of

analyses we conducted, identifying commonalities among these tools and analyses,

and generating requirements for a common conceptual model and abstract transcript.

This first workshop was followed by a second, called “Common Objects for

Productive Multivocality in Analysis” and held at the International Conference on

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2009. Our ongoing discussions

have trigged the addition of another dimension to our focus, that of theoretical

assumptions underlying the analysis. In addition to identifying potential common

objects for productive multivocality at these five levels (theoretical assumptions plus

the four levels from the first workshop), our goal was to identify differences or

divergences and whether these are complementary (potential sources of richer

understanding) or incompatible (potential barriers to a common discipline). The third

workshop in the series “Pinpointing pivotal moments in collaboration” will be held

at the Alpine Rendez-Vous 2009. New participants are welcome. The workshop will

serve to define what constitutes a pivotal moment during self- directed group

learning. In this way the workshop will address the first Grand Challenge in TEL

research, as shaped by STELLAR: “Connecting learners” – supporting self-

directed, self-managed and self-maintained communities and create successful new

forms of collaboration. The specific goals of the workshop are to use what we have

elaborated on interaction analysis in our two previous workshops in order to identify

these particular pivotal moments. Our long-term publication goal is to propose an

edited book in the CSCL book series on pivotal moments in collaboration to be

discussed during this workshop. In addition, the organizers will propose a journal

article for IJCSCL using the five previously mentioned dimensions to discuss

productive multivocality in generating insights for pivotal moments of collaboration.

Call for Participation


Interested researchers should submit at least a two-page abstract to

kristine.lund@univ-lyon2.fr by August 30th, 2009.

The abstract should indicate which type of participation is requested (see below -

basic participation, analyst/discussant, data presenter). Organizers will choose a

limited number of participants. Acceptance letters will be sent out on September

10th, 2009.

Basic Participation: Basic participants should submit at least two

pages summarizing their relevant prior experience, their objectives in participating in

this workshop, and a bibliography of relevant publications.  We also request a pointer

to one (or exceptionally two) relevant publication(s) and any relevant URL

demonstrating the researcherʼs work (for example a website dedicated to a particular

interaction analysis tool).

Analyst/Discussant: Researchers who wish to be selected as analyst or discussant

should meet the requirements for Basic Participation (2-page abstract as explained

above) and also submit up to two pages summarizing the following characterizations

of the analytic work they typically undertake in relation to how they understand the

notion of pivotal moments in collaboration: (1) theoretical assumptions; (2) purpose of

analysis; (3) units of interaction (4) notations for data and interpretations; and (5)

analytic manipulations.

Data Presenter: Researchers who wish to offer a data corpus should meet the

requirements for Basic Participation (2-page abstract as explained above) and also

submit up to two pages summarizing the nature of the corpus and making the case

that this data will serve the objectives of the workshop. Data presenters may also

serve as analysts or discussants.

The Alpine Rendez-Vous


This 2009 Alpine Rendez-Vous is the second event of a series. It is organized and

funded by STELLAR, a new European network of excellence on learning

technologies (http://www.stellarnet.eu/). It is not a conference but a set of

independent workshops held in the same hotel during the same week. Four

workshops will be held on the Monday-Tuesday and four other workshops on the

Wednesday-Thursday. On the Tuesday afternoon, all workshop participants are

invited to join a common section, the Rendez-Vous, ending up with a social event.

Financial aspects


Participants will be selected based on their submissions. There are no registration

fees. Participants pay for their own travel and lodging. However, funding for hotel and

food will be available for a limited number of participants and this will be decided by

the organizers.

Location


The Alpine Rendez-Vous will be held in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, a mountain village

in the South of Germany (http://www.garmisch-partenkirchen.de). Closest airports are

Munich and Innsbruck (in Austria).

Workshop Format and provisional schedule


The 2-day workshop will be interactive and based on sharing corpora and analyses

with the negotiation of different roles taken on by the selected participants.

Each participant will apply for one of three roles: 1) data presenter, 2) analysis

presenter and/or 3) discussant. Each of the two data presenters chosen will not only

present the nature of the data and how it was collected, but also the original research

problem that inspired the data collection, whether the problem was theoretical or

practice-oriented as well as the original pivotal moments of collaboration that were

discovered. Analysis presenters will have access to chosen data before the

workshop and will do their own analyses on them (chosen data sets must thus be

shareable). It may be possible for teams of people to propose to present two different

analyses done on the same data set and thus occupy data presenter/first analysis

presenter as well as second analysis presenter roles. Discussants will have access

as well to data sets and analyses before hand in order to prepare their comments.

There will be 2 data presenter roles, 2 analysis presenter roles and 4 discussant

roles (see schedule below). The remainder of the workshop participants will be

expected to participate in general discussion.

Monday, November 30th, 2009

8:30 am – 9:00 am: Short introduction to the objectives and structure of the

workshop

Kristine Lund

9:00 am – 10:30 am: Each participant or team will give a 5 min introduction to their

work, essentially highlighting what they have written in their proposal so that

participants are sensitized to the voices of each of the participants/ teams.

10:30 – 11:00: Coffee break

11:00 – 12:00: Presentation of the first data set, its context and a first analysis

12:00 – 12:30: Discussant: What are the consequences of the described pivotal

moments?

12:30 – 13:30: Lunch

13:30 – 16:30 Free time

16:30 – 17:30: Presentation of a second analysis of first data set (different pivotal

moments of collaboration than first analysis)

17:30 – 18:30: Discussant: What are the consequences of the described pivotal

moments?

18:30 – 19:00: Coffee break

19:00 pm – 20:00 pm: Discussant: Synthesis of two different analyses of pivotal

moments of collaboration on first data set: Insights and challenges for productive

multivocality.  What do each of the analytic perspectives expose about pivotal

moments? Can we productively use multiple analytic perspectives? How would one

use the results of such an analysis to inform collaborative learning?

Final discussions on what insights we have gained about common objects for

analysis and points of divergence; requirements for a common conceptual model and

abstract transcript

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

8:30 – 9:30: Presentation of the second data set, its context and a first analysis

9:30 – 10:30: Discussant: What are the consequences of the described pivotal

moments?

10:30 – 11:00: Coffee break

11:00 am – 12:30: Presentation of second analysis of second data set (different

pivotal moments of collaboration than first analysis)

12:30 – 13:30 : Lunch

13:30 – 14:30: Discussant: What are the consequences of the described pivotal

moments?

14:30 – 15:30: Discussant: Synthesis of two different analyses of pivotal moments

of collaboration on first data set: Insights and challenges for productive multivocality.

What do each of the analytic perspectives expose about pivotal moments? Can we

productively use multiple analytic perspectives? How would one use the results of

such an analysis to inform collaborative learning?

15:30 – 16:00: Coffee break

16:00 – 17:00: Workshop wrap-up + publication strategy discussion

Direct Link

Updated: